COMPLETE "Fit & Forget" SOLUTIONS

Our Product Brands

OUR SOLUTION BRANDS

Video

FRP vs Steel in Wastewater Industry

The water and wastewater sector exposes infrastructure to a mix of chemicals, hydrogen sulphide, moisture, and high salinity that rapidly corrode traditional materials such as carbon steel and even stainless steel in harsh environments. Fibreglass Reinforced Plastics (FRP) offers a corrosion-resistant alternative, particularly suited to water and wastewater treatment, desalination, and associated access structures.

This Tech Talk Tuesday topic examines how FRP performs compared to steel in wastewater environments. It explains why vinyl ester-based FRP systems are commonly selected for hydrogen sulphide-rich wastewater and aggressive process areas, how reduced weight and prefabrication simplify installation, and why lifecycle cost often favours FRP even when the upfront price is higher. Case comparisons reinforce these points: stainless steel structures in highly saline, hot regions required frequent replacement, whereas FRP structures were designed for extended service life with minimal maintenance. Industry studies on FRP versus steel in corrosive infrastructure show similar trends, with higher initial material costs offset by lower maintenance costs and a longer service life.

The session also touches on environmental considerations. FRP solutions can reduce embodied carbon by preventing multiple steel replacements, and research is advancing on end-of-life options for thermoset composites, including solvolysis, pyrolysis, and the use of ground FRP in secondary products or construction applications.

Key Benefits

  • High corrosion resistance in wastewater conditions
    FRP, especially when manufactured with vinyl ester resin systems, is inherently resistant to hydrogen sulphide, chlorides, and many treatment chemicals, making it well-suited for clarifiers, channels, odour-control covers, and access structures in wastewater treatment plants.
  • Lower lifecycle cost compared with steel in aggressive environments
    While stainless steel or coated steel may appear cheaper at purchase, repeated recoating, repairs, and early replacement in saline and hydrogen sulphide-rich environments increase total cost. Lifecycle analyses in comparable infrastructure show FRP can achieve 30 to 50 per cent savings over extended service periods when corrosion is a controlling factor.
  • Reduced weight and more straightforward installation
    FRP structures are often up to several times lighter than steel, allowing the use of smaller cranes, avoiding temporary bank strengthening around channels, and enabling more prefabrication and off-site modular assembly. This reduces installation time, plant shutdown windows and associated safety risks.
  • Improved safety and maintainability
    FRP does not rust, spall or shed sharp corrosion products like steel, and hot work permits are usually not required for on-site cutting or adjustment. Gratings and covers can be designed with anti-slip surfaces and integrated access hatches, which support safer long-term operation and inspection in water and wastewater facilities.
  • Environmental and end-of-life considerations
    FRP can reduce the number of replacement cycles compared with traditional steel solutions, which improves whole-of-life environmental performance. At the same time, ongoing research into recycling thermoset FRP, including solvolysis, energy recovery and reuse of glass fibres and fillers, is expanding future end-of-life options for composite infrastructure.

Applications

  • Odour control covers and tank roofs.
    FRP panels and dome covers provide durable, corrosion-resistant odour control over channels, tanks, and sewer trunkways, with integrated hatches, flashings, and foul-air duct connections for gas collection. These systems are widely used across Australian wastewater treatment plants.
  • Walkways, platforms and access bridges
    FRP gratings, beams and handrails form lightweight access structures around clarifiers, aeration tanks, pumping stations and intake works, where conventional steel walkways are prone to rapid corrosion and require frequent repainting.
  • Cooling towers and process structures in corrosive plants
    In high humidity, saline and chemically loaded atmospheres, FRP support structures and platforms can replace stainless or painted steel to extend service life and reduce the cost of heavy lifting, oversized footings and access for future replacement.
  • Water treatment intakes and screening systems
    FRP trash racks, screens, overcovers, and associated walkways are suitable for river or coastal intake structures where fluctuating water levels, debris loading and saline splash put severe demands on metallic structures.
  • Future-ready infrastructure upgrades
    When utilities upgrade ageing steel or concrete elements in water and wastewater plants, FRP offers a way to improve durability, simplify construction logistics and prepare for tighter environmental expectations over the coming decades.

Key Moments

  • 00:13 "👋 Introduction to Tech Talk Tuesday focusing on FRP versus steel in the wastewater industry.
  • 01:29 📊 Participants encouraged to provide feedback and suggest future topics during Q&A.
  • 02:09 💧 Overview of water treatment, including both fresh and wastewater treatment processes.
  • 02:52 ⚠️ Corrosion is a significant issue in wastewater treatment due to harsh chemicals and hydrogen sulphide.
  • 03:31 🛡️ FRP offers excellent corrosion resistance, reducing maintenance needs compared to traditional materials.
  • 04:11 🚚 FRP is lightweight, providing design flexibility and ease of installation.
  • 04:59 💰 Cost savings from FRP include lower maintenance and installation expenses compared to steel.
  • 06:24 📅 FRP has a proven design life of 55 years, enhancing long-term reliability in wastewater applications.
  • 07:10 ⚖️ Cost comparison: FRP installation costs significantly lower per year than stainless steel in corrosive environments.
  • 10:00 📈 Stainless steel has a limited lifespan (10-25 years) in harsh conditions, while FRP offers a more durable solution.
  • 12:20 🔍 Inspections can assess FRP product life, with various methods to determine structural integrity.
  • 15:57 🌱 Discussion on environmental impacts of FRP, including recycling challenges due to its thermoset polymer components.
  • 19:28 🏗️ Showcase of completed projects, including FRP structures for wastewater treatment and trash screens.
  • 21:28 📧 Call to action for feedback and further engagement on upcoming webinars and topics."

Why Treadwell?

Treadwell has extensive experience delivering FRP solutions for water and wastewater facilities, from EcoEX odour-control cover systems to FRP walkways, platforms, stairways, and structural shapes built for hydrogen sulphide-rich and saline environments. Our teams understand how to translate real plant conditions into appropriate resin selection, detailing and design life so that FRP genuinely outperforms steel in service rather than just on paper. Combined with case-proven long-term performance, support for project-specific design and inspections, and a growing focus on environmental outcomes, Treadwell is well placed to help utilities and industrial clients modernise their water and wastewater infrastructure with durable, low-maintenance FRP systems.

Get In Touch

1800 246 800

sales@treadwellgroup.com.au

Scroll to Top

Make an Enquiry